<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Naivete Scene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.codeeg.com/2007/05/15/the-naivete-scene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.codeeg.com/2007/05/15/the-naivete-scene/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Burkett</title>
		<link>http://blog.codeeg.com/2007/05/15/the-naivete-scene/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Burkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codeeg.com/2007/05/15/the-naivete-scene/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Hi there, Calvin. Good post.  We do need more experimentation and exploration here in Atlanta - that is what innovation is all about.  I wholeheartedly agree.

However, I think it is important to keep in mind the context of my original post.  An entrepreneur approached me about building a &quot;better twitter&quot; but was at a loss to answer even basic questions about his business model.  It is also important to point out that he wasn&#039;t building something for the sake of exploration, he truly wanted to build a business out of it, and made no bones about it.

In this case, I think my advice to him was very sound.  Don&#039;t decide to &quot;start a business&quot;, and then decide to try to build a &quot;better Twitter&quot; because you can - anything can be improved upon. That&#039;s easy.  Build a &quot;better Twitter&quot; because you&#039;ve innovated the business model.

&quot;Foolishness&quot; is good - but foolishness doesn&#039;t mix well with venture capital (and even cash-flow in most cases.) Most especially so in an overly conservative market like Atlanta.

Failure is a part of success - but an entrepreneur should fail trying to innovate the business, not the technology.  The net is littered with the remnants of a ton of really nifty technologies.

Hope that makes sense.  No, I don&#039;t like Twitter, and that is a personal nitpick.  But that really was only an aesthetic point of my post ... plus it gave me something to rant about in my opening. :)

You can replace the word &quot;Twitter&quot; in my post, and my advice would still be the same.

Cheers.
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, Calvin. Good post.  We do need more experimentation and exploration here in Atlanta &#8211; that is what innovation is all about.  I wholeheartedly agree.</p>
<p>However, I think it is important to keep in mind the context of my original post.  An entrepreneur approached me about building a &#8220;better twitter&#8221; but was at a loss to answer even basic questions about his business model.  It is also important to point out that he wasn&#8217;t building something for the sake of exploration, he truly wanted to build a business out of it, and made no bones about it.</p>
<p>In this case, I think my advice to him was very sound.  Don&#8217;t decide to &#8220;start a business&#8221;, and then decide to try to build a &#8220;better Twitter&#8221; because you can &#8211; anything can be improved upon. That&#8217;s easy.  Build a &#8220;better Twitter&#8221; because you&#8217;ve innovated the business model.</p>
<p>&#8220;Foolishness&#8221; is good &#8211; but foolishness doesn&#8217;t mix well with venture capital (and even cash-flow in most cases.) Most especially so in an overly conservative market like Atlanta.</p>
<p>Failure is a part of success &#8211; but an entrepreneur should fail trying to innovate the business, not the technology.  The net is littered with the remnants of a ton of really nifty technologies.</p>
<p>Hope that makes sense.  No, I don&#8217;t like Twitter, and that is a personal nitpick.  But that really was only an aesthetic point of my post &#8230; plus it gave me something to rant about in my opening. <img src='http://blog.codeeg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You can replace the word &#8220;Twitter&#8221; in my post, and my advice would still be the same.</p>
<p>Cheers.<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
